FORT DRUM The 10th Mountain Division will inactivate its 3rd Brigade Combat Team and lose about 1,500 soldiers between now and fiscal year 2017 as a part of a massive restructuring of the Army announced Tuesday.
Though the brigade has about 3,000 to 3,500 soldiers, the loss of the brigade will be softened by the expected move of maneuver battalions to each of the remaining two brigades.
With 19,024 soldiers stationed at the post, according to the installations 2012 economic impact statement, a loss of 1,500 soldiers represents a reduction of about 8 percent.
The cuts are a part of a plan by the Army to reduce its soldier levels from about 570,000 to about 490,000 by fiscal year 2017, equal to 14 percent of the services active component. The Army also will drop from 45 to 33 brigade combat teams as a result of the cuts.
The change was announced by Army chief of staff Gen. Ray Odierno during a press briefing at the Pentagon.
Maj. Gen. Stephen J. Townsend, post and division commander, said in a statement that he did not expect the loss of the brigade would have a major impact because of the battalion reshuffling.
Fort Drum remains one of the newest, most sustainable, state of the art installations in our nations Army, he said. With the last decade of installation improvements, it is well known that we are among the most capable for training opportunities and family support services. These will be the drivers of the 10th Mountains continued mission success here at Fort Drum for a long time to come.
Rep. William L. Owens, D-Plattsburgh, said in a conference call with reporters that the soldier reduction would not have a substantial impact on the overall economic outlook for the area, given the amount of time given for the reduction.
Describing the level of reductions as a glass half empty or half full situation, he said the decision shows the clear understanding of the Army that they have one of the most deployed, most trained and most competitive units in the Army in the 10th Mountain Division and they want to preserve that.
Mr. Owens said he wanted a clarification from Gen. Townsend about the timing of the soldier reductions.
Though Gen. Odierno said during his statement that $400 million of military construction was cut across the service, Mr. Owens said none of the projects for Fort Drum in fiscal years 2013 or 2014 was affected.
In a statement, Sen. Charles E. Schumer said that large budget cuts were unavoidable until compromise could be found on taxes and overall government spending.
My hope is that these cuts might get other leaders to the table to work toward a solution that prevents taking a machete to national security and impacting Fort Drum any further, he said.
Sen. Kirsten E. Gillibrand said in a statement that she was in contact with military leaders to inform them of the posts value.
Gen. Odiernos press conference was run to begin a meeting Tuesday of the Fort Drum Regional Liaison Organization that started at the same time.
Carl A. McLaughlin, the organizations executive director, said the cut was something it had planned for in the past few months.
Any loss is not wanted, but we understood that possiblity was out there, he said.
Mr. McLaughlin said it was even more important now for community members to reach out to the military to help its growth.
We have to continue to concentrate on whatever we feel brings military value to Fort Drum, he said. This is a long-run game.
The 10th Mountain Divisions 4th Brigade Combat Team will remain at Fort Polk, La., according to U.S. Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La.
The 3rd Brigade Combat Team, activated at Fort Drum in September 2004, deployed to Afghanistan in 2006, 2009 and 2011, and is planning for another deployment to the country later this year, though it has not been confirmed by the Department of Defense.
The cuts in the Army force levels are not connected to sequestration. During his remarks, Gen. Odierno said that if sequestration were allowed to continue, the service would have to make larger cuts and consider deactivating more brigades, along with National Guard and Army Reserve soldiers.
The planned long-term cuts have been discussed for months around the Fort Drum area after the Army evaluated the local economic impact of cutting as many as 8,000 soldiers and adding as many as 3,000 soldiers.
In the worst scenario of cutting 8,000 soldiers, the area surrounding Fort Drum was projected to lose thousands of jobs and hundreds of millions of dollars in economic activity and incomes. Area schools, housing and hospitals would also be negatively affected by such a move, according to a response to the assessment compiled by the Fort Drum Regional Liaison Organization.
In May, Gen. Townsend told the state Senate that he was almost certain the post would lose a brigade.
Other installations facing the loss of brigade combat teams are Fort Bliss, Texas; Fort Bragg, N.C.; Fort Campbell, Ky.; Fort Carson, Colo.; Fort Hood, Texas; Fort Knox, Ky.; Fort Riley, Kan.; Fort Stewart, Ga., and Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Wash. Two brigades in Germany will continue their already scheduled inactivation.
One more brigade combat team is left to be deactivated, but Gen. Odierno said he was not sure which one would be axed.